Skip to Local Navigation
Skip to Content
California State University, Long Beach
Print this pageAdd this page to your favoritesSelect a small fontSelect a medium fontSelect a large font
 

<< Back to Appendix F, EER WASC Core Commitment III, Capacity & Preparatory Review, 2008

Plans for Implementation of WASC Commitment III Effectiveness Review Projects for the EER
DRAFT Revised Aug 21, 2008

Leaders

Jalal Torabzadeh, Dave Dowell, Mary Ann Takemoto

Due 11/15/09

Deliverable: An introduction, then six essays centered on the research questions. The appendices would include research report from each research team.

Committee

Van Novack, Leslie Kennedy, Michelle Saint Germain, Lisa Maxfield, Mary Ann Takemoto, S. Thomas, Jalal Torabzadeh, Dave Dowell

Theme Leader

Van Novack

Dave Dowell

Leslie Kennedy

Michelle Saint Germain, Lisa Maxfield

Mary Ann Takemoto

S. Thomas


Theme

Grad rates

Barriers to Graduation

Learning Outcomes in Distance Ed

Learning Outcomes in Program Review

Learning Outcomes in Student Services

Learning Outcomes in the Workplace and Graduate School

Due 8/15/09

Deliverable: Essays addressing respective research questions.

Research questions (from proposal)

How successful have we been in fostering the use of data to raise retention and graduation rates for each department, college, and student subgroup?

Based on the data collected in the Capacity and Preparatory Review, how successful have we been in removing barriers to graduation, with particular emphasis on high failure rate courses, the Graduation Writing Assessment Requirement, and advising?

How effective have we been in employing the results of assessments of student learning outcomes and student support services to improve quality assurance for off campus, distance ed.?

How has student learning been impacted by our efforts to assess student learning outcomes in every academic program, including General Education?

How successful have we been in integrating student learning outcomes in our programs and services outside the classroom?

How successful have we been in ensuring that our graduates have the skills and knowledge that employers and graduate schools expect?

Draft length

3 pages

8 pages, about 1 page per project

2 pages

5 pages

3 pages

3 pages

Potential methods

Report data on changes in retention and graduation rate by college, department, student groups and overall.

Ask leads (see below) to write about programs, uses of data:

  • Graduation programs
  • Low Course Completion project
  • Beach Learning Community
  • 2nd Sem. Advising
  • New Writing Courses
  • ASI Success Committee
  • Math reform

Review use of assessment data in distance education programs.

Report on department level use of assessment data within the program review process.

Student Services report on development and use of assessment data.

Compile program review results?

Conduct focus groups or surveys with employers and grad schools?

Project group (To be placed
J. Cusimano)

D. Dowell, T. Enders, T. Allen

  • M. Samuelson, S. Black-graduation
  • T. Allen-low course
  • H. Fung & M. Wiley-BLC
  • G. Fenton-advising
  • L. Sarbo, C. Nyssen-writing
  • J. Davis-ASI committee
  • X. Li, B. Benken-math

J. Torabzadeh

GA

D. Edwards

K. Powers
S. Thomas
M. Saint Germain
J. Torabzadeh
W. Martin