<< Back to Appendix F, Capacity & Preparatory Review, 2008
| Core Commitments | Topic | CPR | EER | Who Will Take the Lead? | F06 | S07 | F07 | S08 | F08 | S09 | F09 | S10 | F10 | S11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Organizing for Effectiveness |
Communication | 1. What changes have occurred in decisionmaking and communication processes on major issues such as enrollment growth and technology as a result of administrative and Academic Senate organizational changes? How have these changes impacted the effectiveness of our decisionmaking? | Academic Affairs, Academic Senate | X |
X |
X |
||||||||
I. Organizing for Effectiveness |
Communication | 2. How accessible, available and accurate are our print and electronic information sources and how can we increase the sharing of this information with both on- and off-campus constituencies to foster decision-making, further community relations, and facilitate student success? | Outside Consultants, Academic Affairs, Administration and Finance, Student Services, Public Affairs/URD | |||||||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||||
I. Organizing for Effectiveness |
Program Review and Assessment | 3. How has the new Program Review and Assessment Policy furthered the assessment of student learning outcomes across the curriculum and in General Education? How has the new Program Review and Assessment Policy supported our efforts to graduate students with highly- valued degrees? | Academic Affairs, Chairs and Deans, Academic Senate | |||||||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||
II. Staffing for Effectiveness |
Recruitment of Faculty | 1. What are our current challenges with respect to recruiting, retaining, and supporting a highly qualified and diverse faculty, particularly as they relate to workload, salary, and satisfaction? | 3. Based on the evidence gathered in the Capacity and Preparatory Review, how can we be more effective in recruiting, retaining and supporting a highly qualified and diverse faculty and staff who are committed to the institutional goals of student learning? | Academic Affairs, Chairs and Deans, Academic Senate, Administration and Finance (HR) | X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||
II. Staffing for Effectiveness |
Recruitment of Staff | 2. What are our current challenges with respect to recruiting, retaining, and supporting a highly qualified and diverse faculty, particularly as they relate to workload, salary, and satisfaction? | 4. Based on the evidence gathered in the Capacity and Preparatory Review, how can we be more effective in recruiting, retaining and supporting a highly qualified and diverse faculty and staff who are committed to the institutional goals of student learning? | Administration and Finance (HR) | X |
X |
X |
|||||||
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||
III. Student Success Outcomes |
Use of assessment data/graduation rates | 1. What is our current pattern of graduation rates by department, college and student subgroups and what are our institutional practices to respond to this pattern? | 4. What can we do to increase and enhance our ability to foster the use of data to raise retention and graduation rates for each department, college, and student subgroup? | Institutional Research, Academic Affairs, Academic Senate, Deans, Chairs, Advisors (Academic Affairs and Student Services), ASI | X |
X |
X |
|||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||
III. Student Success Outcomes |
Resolving common academic problems | 2. What are our current common barriers to graduation, with particular emphasis on high failure rate course, the Graducation Writing Assessment Requirement, and advising | 5. How successful have we been in removing barriers to graducation, with particular emphasis on high failure rate courses, the Graduation Writing Assessment Requirement, and advising? | Academic Affairs, Institutional Research, Enrollment Services, FCDP, Deans and Chairs, Advising staff (Academic Affairs and Student Services), ASI, Academic Senate (GWAR) | X |
X |
X |
|||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||
III. Student Success Outcomes |
Learning outcomes in academic programs, including GE | 6. How has student learning been impacted by our efforts to assess student learning outcomes in every academic program, including general education? | FCPD, Academic Affairs (Assessment), Deans, Chairs Academic Senate (GEGC), Advisors (Academic Affairs and Student Services), ASI, College Councils | |||||||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||
III. Student Success Outcomes |
Learning outcomes in programs outside the classroom | 7. How is evidence of student learning used to improve and enhance our programs and services outside the classroom? | Student Services, ASI, Directors of Co-Curricular Programs and Support Services | |||||||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||
III. Student Success Outcomes |
Off-Campus and Distance Education Programs | 3. What structures, policies and processes are in place for assessing student learning outcomes, financial and technological resources, faculty and staff qualifications and support, and student support services for our distance and off-campus programs? | 8. How effective have we been in employing the results of our assessments of student learning outcomes and student support services to imporve our quality assurance practices for our distance education programs? | FCPD, Academic Affair (Assessment), Deans, Chairs, Academic Senate (GEGC), Advisors (Academic Affairs and Student Services), College Councils | X |
X |
X |
|||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||
III. Student Success Outcomes |
External perceptions of our graduates | 9. How do we ensure that our graduates have the skills and knowledge that employers and graduate schools expect? | Academic Affairs/ Student Services, Alumni Affairs, URD, Public Affairs, Career Development Center, Chairs, and Deans | |||||||||||
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |