Skip to Local Navigation
Skip to Content
California State University, Long Beach
Print this pageAdd this page to your favoritesSelect a small fontSelect a medium fontSelect a large font
 

Appendix III.3: Graduation Rate Project

The Graduation Rate Project was initiated by the Vice-Provost for Planning & Budgets/Director of Strategic Planning to assist colleges in understanding and using data specific to graduation rates.  The primary concerns that prompted this examination of graduation rates included the following:

  • Need to improve the 46% 6-year graduation rates (1998 cohort)
  • Lower grad rate for transfer juniors (59.4%) compared to native juniors (75.1%)
  • Significant variation among colleges in graduation rates

The project was developed and facilitated by the Vice-Provost, the Director of the Faculty Center for Professional Development, the Director of Program Assessment and Review, and Institutional Research and Assessment staff. Teams comprised of an Associate Dean and a faculty member from each college were charged with developing a college-specific plan for disseminating information about graduate rates, student retention, and student success.  Specifically, teams were asked to accomplish the following objectives:

  • Ascertain the retention and graduation rates for your departments and college.
  • Present graduation rates to college and departments for discussion.
  • Identify best practices and document the reasons for notable improvements.
  • Suggest strategies for improving student success to college deans and the provost.

The Office of Institutional Research and Assessment provided graduation rate data for this project.  The Director of the Faculty Center for Professional Development and the Director of Program Assessment and Review co-facilitated college teams in a semester-long series of lunches aimed at assisting teams in accomplishing their objectives.  College teams examined patterns of retention and graduation rates by department, college and student subgroups, including the following:

  • Lower graduation rates for junior transfer students than for native juniors across all colleges
  • Variations by ethnic group, including about 58% for White students (slightly below national average); about 42% for African American students (slightly above the national average); about 44% for Asian students (well below the national average); and about 46% for Latina/o students (slightly above the national average)

Each college team developed one-hour workshops that provided an overview of the university graduation rate along with college and department-specific graduation rate data.  The workshop also included college-specific recommendations for improving student success and graduation rates.  Workshops were delivered in colleges at retreats, at meetings, or to invited groups (e.g., college faculty advisors, college curriculum committees, college councils).  The information campaign resulted in wide-spread discussion of how graduation rates could be improved without compromising educational quality.  Several ideas for changing institutional policies, organizational structures, and practices to improve graduation rates emerged from these discussions, including the following:

  • New Faculty Academic Advising Policy
  • Faculty-friendly Institutional Research and Assessment website
  • Professional Development Program for Faculty Advisors
  • Revised General Education Policy
  • Revised Reappointment, Tenure, & Promotion Policy
  • Faculty “culture shift” about student success issues

Data suggest that our graduation rate has improved over time, and we anticipate that it will continue to improve.  However, to ensure that this trend continues, we must overcome several challenges, including the following:

  • We must analyze what factors lead to improved graduation rates and reinforce these best practices.
  • We must develop strategies for continued improvement in the context of budget cuts.
  • We must monitor our progress and acknowledge significant contributions to improved graduation rates.
  • We must continue efforts to establish a campus culture of student success.