Division ID
Skip links
 
 
Print this pageAdd this page to your favoritesSelect a font sizeSmall fontMedium fontLarge font
 

Assessment Committee

CSULB

Minutes 16 October 2003

 

1. The committee was called to order by the chair, Susan Mulvaney, at 2:08 p.m. in the Academic Senate conference room.  Members Present:  Jose Aguinaga (Library), Susan Mulvaney (Testing & Evaluation Services), Van Novack (Institutional Research), Jeane Relleve-Caveness (Student Services), Dave Samuelson (English), Dave Whitney (Psychology), Mark Wiley (Faculty Development), Mason Zhang (Biological Sciences).

2.  The committee approved the agenda as distributed, acknowledging the absence of a report from the absent Assessment Coordinator. 

3. Announcements: 

a. The chair distributed additional documents for consideration and review, supplementing those distributed on 2 October.

b. The secretary announced his probable absence on 30 October, necessitating a replacement.

c. Mark Wiley requested agenda time on 30 October for a decision regarding whom to select as three campus representatives to a conference in Long Beach of the American Association of Colleges and Universities.  

4. The committee approved the minutes of its 2 October meeting with a correction in the spelling of Michelle Saint-Germain in item 5.  At the suggestion of the secretary, it also corrected the minutes of 5 September, which in item 3 misstated the committee’s meeting schedule as “alternate weeks.”  The correct schedule is posted on the Assessment pages of the CSULB website.

5. The committee discussed two applications for travel funding, one of which it was decided could possibly be funded from the High School Outreach and Academic Preparation (HSOAP) budget.  The other was tabled till the committee hears from the Assessment Coordinator about calls for proposals, criteria, and past records.

6. The committee began discussions of the 1995 Campus Assessment Plan (more precisely viewed as a Plan to Create a Plan).  Michelle in absentia suggested separating discussion of Administrative and Academic Senate responsibility, and distinguishing assessment from implementation activities.  Questions of obsolescence, coherence, and viability surfaced before Van Novack asked whether the committee should involve itself in assessment of the consequences of admissions policies generated by impaction.

7. The meeting adjourned at 3:11 p.m.

                                                                                    Respectfully submitted,

                                                                                    Dave Samuelson, Secretary

THESE MINUTES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED.