BSCEM Assessment Results and Action for Improvement for each Outcome
The program assessment was conducted in the academic year 2010-2011. The assessment results and Action for Improvement for each program outcome are summarized below.
Program Outcome A
Assessment Feedback:
Senior and Alumni surveys show acceptable performance
Employer surveys show marginal performance
Concerns:
Alumni ranked Valuable to their career
Employer ranked near top for importance
Student performance can be improved
Action for Improvement:
Review courses in these areas with accreditation guide
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome A
Program Outcome B
Assessment Feedback:
All surveys show satisfactory performance
Concerns:
Employer ranked top for importance
Action for Improvement:
Review courses that cover these areas
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome B
Program Outcome C
Assessment Feedback:
Senior and Alumni show above average performance
Employer surveys show acceptable performance
Concerns:
Alumni and Employer surveys show concerns about this ability of employees
Action for Improvement:
Review courses of these areas
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome C
Program Outcome D
Assessment Feedback:
Performance measured shows above average satisfaction
Concerns:
None
Action for Improvement:
Review courses of these areas
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome D
Program Outcome E
Assessment Feedback:
Senior surveys show high satisfaction
Alumni and Employer surveys show above acceptable performance
Concerns:
Alumni and Employers ranked high level for importance
Action for Improvement:
Introduce emerging technologies (e.g. BIM and Green Technologies) in construction
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome E
Program Outcome F
Assessment Feedback:
Senior surveys show high performance
Alumni surveys chow acceptable performance
Employer surveys show marginal performance
Concerns:
Alumni ranked near top for importance
Action for Improvement:
Review courses in these areas
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome F
Program Outcome G
Assessment Feedback:
All surveys show high performance
Concerns:
None
Action for Improvement:
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome G
Program Outcome H
Assessment Feedback:
Senior survey results show high satisfaction
Alumni and Employer surveys show high performance
Concerns:
Employers ranked high level for importance
Action for Improvement:
Develop a rubric to evaluate student performance in regard to this particular program learning outcome H
Other recent implementation for improvement of the program academic quality
The faculty of the Construction Engineering Management program and the Industrial Advisory & Development Council reviewed the existing curriculum of the CEM program and made some changes in order to satisfy the ACCE requirements. After lengthy discussions between the COE/CECEM Department and the College of Business Administration, the CEM Program included the following additional courses as part of the curriculum beginning catalog year 2011-2012:
MGMT 413 or (HRM 361) - Quality Management for Productivity or (The Human Resource Function) - 3 units
BLAW 220 or (BLAW 320) Business Laws or (Legal & Reg. Environment of Business) - 3 units
CBA 300 International Business - 3 units
These courses complete the 18 unit requirements for Business and Management. The other 9 units that are already part of the program requirements include: ECON 300 (3 units), ACCT 201 (3 units) and MGMT 300 (3 units).
*Note: although every effort is made to keep this Web site
up to date, you should also consult the printed catalog for official
information and program requirements, which may vary depending on the
year you enter(ed) the program.
