VOL. LIV, NO. 111
California State University, Long Beach May 3 , 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jeff Overley
Opinion Editor

Trent Loomis
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jon Cook
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Jennie Lessel
Production Staff


Lego Hartanto
Webmaster

 

. News  
 

Our View: This editorial brought to you by ...

A U.S. district judge ruled Thursday that the Kentucky Horse Racing Association must allow jockeys to wear advertisements on their silks in all races, including the Kentucky Derby, which was held Saturday. The jockeys who sued claimed that they had been offered upward of $30,000 to adorn their pants with patches and logos of various sponsors, and that the prohibition by the association was an infringement upon their rights.

What these jockeys need to realize is that they are a part of an association. While we're all for the free market, if individual participants have the right to defy the regulations of such an association, then no defense can be raised against having advertisements covering every surface in every organization.

In the NFL, the San Diego Chargers could be renamed the San Diego MasterCards. They could rename the stadium so that it no longer honored the sports columnist who helped to bring the team to San Diego but instead publicized a wireless telephone and Internet service provider or a chain of pet stores -- oh wait, they already did that.

Which bears our point out even further. Sports especially, but also entertainment in general, have been infiltrated extensively by advertising during the past decade, so that now even the most mundane of things seem to be brought to us by some company.

The "lifeline" on "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" and the call-in vote on "American Idol" both promote phone companies. A special question and answer portion of ESPN's "Sportscenter," the "Budweiser Hot Seat," reminds us that the King of Beers and sports go hand in hand. The first third of several women's fashion magazines is dedicated to pictures of depressed -- yet well dressed -- young men and women. Even the backs of lesser-rated boxers are decorated with temporary tattoos beseeching viewers to visit GoldenPalace.com.

Some of these examples, admittedly, aren't really the purest of events to begin with. Whereas jockeys who look like little billboards detract from the tradition and spirit of the Triple Crown series, incessant phone ads on shallow game shows probably don't ruin the dignity of anything.

But in many cases, the most revered of our institutions are being defiled by profit hungry businesses desperate to work their way into a new niche. And of course, businesses have been more than eager to accept these ads. In sports, San Francisco's hallowed Candlestick Park was renamed 3Com Park and then PacBell Park, which is slightly less gaudy, but commercial nonetheless. Even more egregious was the fate of Philadelphia's Veteran's Stadium, which was a one-star venue if there ever was one and deserved to be imploded, as it was. But the new stadium built in its place dropped the original moniker in favor of "Lincoln Financial." Presumably the veterans had been honored enough.

People aren't going to stop responding to advertisements, so if this deluge of commercialization is to be stopped it will be up to conscientious businesses and a judicial respect for the prerogatives of private leagues and associations. And if that doesn't happen, we may be forced to solicit advertisements in our very own On-line Forty-Niner.

 

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved