Ourview
Homeless
can not be ignored
We encounter the homeless constantly in
our daily lives and still they remain almost
nonexistent in our daily consciousness.
Maybe we will give the homeless man who
hangs out in front of Taco Bell a buck or
two so that we can feel benevolent, even
though we secretly suspect he will buy whiskey
with our hard-earned dollar. Other than
the fact that we generously donated a dollar
to charity, the event fades from our minds
and we continue on unfazed by the estimated
84,000 people who spend their nights on
the streets or in emergency shelters in
Los Angeles County.
A report issued to Los Angeles County Sheriff
Lee Baca offered proposals to help ease
what some experts have termed an emergency
situation regarding the high population
of homeless people in Los Angeles. The report
“is the product of a September gathering
of activists and civic leaders at which
Los Angeles was called ‘ground zero’ for
the problem of homelessness in the nation,”
the Los Angeles Times reported.
Anyone who has ventured anywhere near the
Los Angeles area can attest to the tragic
situation of the homeless that we have so
innocently allowed our lawmakers to sweep
under the rug that is downtown Los Angeles.
The report suggested that zoning rules be
legally changed so that communities can
no longer exist as islands, removed from
the plight of the homeless. Zoning rules
currently allow “not in my back yard” sentiments
that keep the homeless and mentally ill
far from corrupting utopian communities
by concentrating facilities in downtown
Los Angeles.
New York currently has a right-to-shelter
law that requires emergency housing to be
found for homeless people. The report being
considered by Baca includes a proposal for
studying the implementation of such a law
here in California.
The most controversial of the report’s suggestions
asks that “some arts money — such as construction
fees set aside for sculpture or other art
— be shifted to homeless programs. Several
area cities, including Los Angeles, require
such set-asides,” the L.A. Times reported.
Of course, art patrons are not thrilled
at the idea. They have made the valid point
that if every social problem were solved
tomorrow because art money was diverted
to such a cause, no one would want to live
in Los Angeles because there would be no
parks or museums. It makes sense, but it
does not negate the validity of assigning
priority to human lives rather than material
structures. Art is a necessary part of any
healthy society, but how can we enjoy the
beauty art has to offer when so many thousands
cannot even enjoy a warm bed and a hot meal.
Baca seems to be a supporter of a lot of
the report’s advocacy. Baca told the L.A.
Times that, “He has become involved in the
issue because the jails in his department
runs are swamped with homeless people arrested
on a variety of violations.” Baca added
that, “It is also a matter of personal conviction.”
It is reassuring to see that someone who
actually has the ability to help the homeless
also has the willingness to initiate the
necessary changes in our legal structure
regarding people who call allies their homes
and their toilets. But putting words down
on a legal document is not enough. Laws
such as the ones proposed in the report
also require public support and a willingness
to accept the problem and deal with it rather
than our current method of pretending it
doesn’t exist. The man standing at the freeway
exit holding his “homeless please help”
sign knows that you see him. Maybe it could
do us all some good to look him in the face
and at least acknowledge that he exists.
|