VOL. LIII, NO. 73
California State University, Long Beach Feburary 13, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Ourview

Drivers, take responsibility


The girl got her license at 16. She got her cell phone that same year for Christmas. The two seemed to go hand in hand.
 
“You need a cell phone in case you have an emergency on the road,” her family insisted.
 
Yes, cell phones are an invaluable aid for the kind of emergencies that most 16-year-olds encounter.
 
The cell phone announced a caller to the tune of Michael Jackson’s “Bad.”
 
“Hello?”
 
“Hey, major emergency,” the caller warned. “Mike’s party got busted. We’re all headed over to Rocketship Park.”
 
After five years of constant driving/gabbing, the girl’s number was finally up. But, despite predictions otherwise, the cell phone was not the culprit. While driving through a parking structure on her way to lunch, the girl experienced a Homeresque craving for the mini donuts (Mmm, donuts) sitting in a baggie just out of reach. As she stretched across the car, she turned her head for that vital second that meant the difference between enjoying the chocolate-coated donuts and smashing into the side of a brand new Audi.
 
The moral of the story is: cell phones do not cause accidents, inattentive people cause accidents.
 
The University of Utah recently released a study concluding that drivers using cell phones experience “inattention blindness,” or the inability to process some visual information. Whatever that study cost, it was too much.
 
We know the majority of people on the road are lousy and inconsiderate drivers. We see it everyday on the freeway when the Lexus tank with the personalized license plate and the “My other car is my yacht” license frame decide that it is their right as a rich person to proceed at 50 mph in the fast lane.
 
In any event, cell phones cause just as much distraction as looking for a CD, setting the radio dial, having a conversation with a passenger or reaching for mini chocolate donuts.
 
Recently in California, Assemblyman Joe Simitian proposed a bill that would ban the use of hand-held cell phones while driving. Violators would be fined $20 for the first offense and $50 for any subsequent offenses. So far, New York is the only state to enact such a law.
 
Simitian has said that banning hand-held cell phones in the car will force motorists to keep two hands on the steering wheel. This belief is plain wishful thinking. Many of us drive with only one hand even when not talking on the phone.
 
It is entirely possible to drive responsibly while talking on the phone. Some people are just worse drivers than others. Many of the people on the road, probably the ones that are causing the cell phone induced accidents, should not even have licenses in the first place. Maybe only allowing people with good driving records to talk on the phone will help alleviate unnecessary brake usage associated with clueless cell phone junkies.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... Beach cheer team scores in Las Vegas

.... Golf team finishes sixth at UCI Anteater Invite

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved