VOL. LIII, NO. 111
California State University, Long Beach April 30, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Regulating Internet sites difficult


As “spam” filters get tighter and tighter, gone are the days when 50 e-mails with messages touting enlargements and porn sites slipped into the unsuspecting web-goers’ mailbox. Now, ambiguously named senders inquire where you’ve been or ask if you’ve heard the latest joke, leading to a suit against one major perpetrator.
 
The Federal Trade Commission and Congress have been trying to find an effective way to crackdown on the Internet since its inception. The Communications Decency Act in 1996 was tacked on to the Telecommunications Act at the last minute in an attempt to control indecent materials. The law was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, not only for its ambiguity and its breadth, but also as limiting the rights of adults in an attempt to protect children.
 
The Child Online Protection Act has also been said to limit the rights of adults by requiring installment of software filters on public library computers. These filters often censor material that is far from indecent but uses words that are red-flagged as obscene. Sites concerning breast cancer are a prime example.
 
Most regulating agencies have encountered problems regulating the Internet due to the very nature of the beast. A worldwide entity that exists on a huge network of interconnected computers, places where the FTC has no jurisdiction. But the commission has pushed on nonetheless,
 
In early 1999, the FTC achieved almost total control over advertising on the Internet. This worldwide honor puts the control to regulate advertising and business practices on the Internet solely in the hands of the FTC.
 
As the next frontier the Internet has been both a boon and a threat to the government. With so many Web sites in so many different nations, there have been difficulties with both regulation and, of course, proper taxation. Citizens of the United States can easily gamble online on a site located in a nation where gaming is legal. Washington just hates having all that money out of reach.
 
It’s hard to find the happy medium between adequate regulation of a potentially dangerous tool and making people realize that often they are taking a risk by putting their information out on the Internet. Responsible business practices are an ideal to be strived for in all commerce industries, but technology always seems to be one step ahead of regulation. As soon as a new filter comes out someone finds a way to get around it.

The Internet appears to be the legislative battleground of the future, with the government and the FTC trying desperately to crackdown on the wild stepchild of the mainstream old school media. Infinite and elusive, the Internet may just slip right through the ever-tightening grip of regulation.
 
Monica L. Pardee is a journalism major at Cal State Long Beach.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... Final Four too final

.... 49ers come up one match short

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved