Online 49er Flag
Online Forty-Niner Special Investigation: Safety
.

ADVERTISEMENT

.

Special Investigation: Safety
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH
MAY 9, 2001


CLASSIFIEDS CLICK HERE

    • Jobs
    • Housing
    • Announcements


New:

POLLS
Bulletin Board
Daily 49er e-shop




Search our site




ONLINE 49ER
DEPARTMENTS

ADVERTISING

CONTACT

DAILY 49ER ALUMNI




Editorial Staff

Andres Cardenas
Editor in Chief

Chris Lew
Managing Editor

Marten Lewerth
News Editor

Christina Esparza
Assistant News Editor

Lyndsey Shinoda
City Editor

Phil Witte
Opinion Editor

Don Weberg
Diversions Editor

Alexander Gordon
Sports Editor

William Mulligan
Publisher

Henrietta Charles
News-Editorial Director

Raul Reis
News Operations Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

special investigation: safety

University addresses building hazards

Cal State Long Beach had several buildings on the California State University list of potential seismic hazards before the Jan. 17, 1994 Northridge earthquake, and it has dealt with many of these potential threats in the past eight years, according to CSULB officials. But some still remain at risk.

CSU's Seismic Review Board compiled a list of 101 buildings requiring detailed engineering assessment and possible retrofit in 1992 after examining 1,364 major CSU facilities. 61.5 of the projects have been completed and 15, upon further evaluation, contained no life safety threat, according to the 2000 Seismic Review Board annual report, leaving 24.5 still requiring attention.

CSULB has never suffered structural damage from an earthquake, however it has been active in preparing the buildings on campus to sustain such an event, said Scott Charmack, associate vice president of physical planning and development.

The goal is not to prevent structures from suffering any damage from a disaster, Charmack said.

"What we look for is life safety, making sure that people are safe inside those buildings if one should hit," he said.

Past earthquakes have been learning experiences for the CSU system, but they have not affected the system's methods of gauging the seismic safety of buildings, according to a CSU official.

"The Northridge earthquake didn't change the Seismic Review Board standards at all," said Patrick Drohan, assistant vice chancellor of capital planning, design and construction. "It just gave us new conditions to deal with. CSU has had a seismic program for a number of years, but we were active in seismic safety before then."

Formed in 1992, the CSU Seismic Review Board was a response to former Gov. George Deukmejian's Executive Order D-86-90, which was issued on Oct. 17, 1989, following the Loma Prieta Earthquake. The order states that all facilities occupied by the state must be evaluated for the ability to meet a seismic performance level. An independent licensed structural engineer, according to the order, must perform the evaluation.

Members of the board are professionals not affiliated with the CSU system. They are in charge of implementing the independent peer review requirements of the trustee's seismic policy and advising CSU on seismic structural engineering issues.

"Independent peer reviews are done when projects are in the design phase," Drohan said. "The board meets periodically to discuss a whole range of seismic issues including any changes in seismic mapping."

The reviews "assure project quality and provide a measure of additional assurance regarding the performance and safety of the completed project," according to the CSU Seismic Policy. "They are not intended to replace the design responsibilities of the engineer of record."

Buildings are continually added to the Board's list with "improved understanding of seismic forces, code updates, discovery of unforeseen site conditions, and the addition of new campuses," according to the report. The most recent list is composed of 145 facilities, 80.5 of which have been completed, and 21 projects remaining in addition to the 24.5 off the original list.

"Many of the initial buildings have been retrofitted," Drohan said. "The risk for injury is greater in some buildings added to the list more recently, so they are a higher priority."

However, not meeting some of the board's standards does not necessarily make the buildings unsafe, Charmack said.

"Standards set by the Seismic Review Board go beyond the current state codes," he said. "They have to meet the state codes at a minimum and in this case the board decided to go beyond."

CSULB buildings on the current list include the Fine Arts Buildings, the Liberal Arts Buildings 2,3,4, and Engineering 3.

"The MacIntosh building was near the top of the list and it was retrofitted in 1994," Charmack said. "The Fine Arts Buildings were next and we're working on them now."

Other buildings were much lower on the list, but all the buildings in the system that were labeled as the highest risks have been taken care of, he said.

"I'd like to look into my crystal ball and give a date," he said. "But the truth is that we would need another bond issue and the state is not sure, given the energy crisis and also with the possible softening of the economy, that it is ready to do that. There are a lot of ‘ifs' in there."

When the Fine Arts building renovation is complete the University Library and Peterson Hall 2 and 3 are next up for repairs followed later by the Liberal Arts Buildings. How far in the future the plans for the Liberal Arts building are is unclear to Charmack.

On the initial list, the MacIntosh Humanities Building ranked as one of the most dangerous buildings in the entire CSU system. Completed in May 1967, it stands as the tallest building at CSULB and is home to many departments. It was retrofitted in 1994 shortly after the Northridge earthquake. Also, the university parking structure was retrofitted, pushing the opening back more than a year in 1995, after the Cal State Northridge parking structure collapsed during the '94 quake.

Fine Arts buildings 1 and 2, which opened in February 1954, are in the middle of a renovation, which was scheduled for completion in August. While the main goal of the renovation was to accommodate the growing College of the Arts, there was seismic retrofitting, asbestos removal and safety code compliance scheduled, Charmack said.

However, the contracting company, Dennis J. Amoroso Construction Inc., was found in default for failing to meet contractual requirements in February and was taken off the assignment, Charmack said.

"Unfortunately the university will have to step in now," he said. "We're not going to let the project sit any longer."

CSULB has been in the process of dealing with other safety issues in the last year, according to Charmack. The university is currently working on a telecommunications upgrade, including the original telephone room for the university, which is still the main distribution frame in the basement of LA 3.

"First of all it is in a basement," Charmack said. "If you know anything about water, it seeks its lowest level of potential energy, i.e., it flows downhill. The room has flooded a couple of times and is also about a quarter of the size that it needs to be."

Facilities management plans to relocate that room, then build another small one that will be 1,200 square feet and expand another, according CSULB officials.

Fine Arts Building 1

Fine Arts Building 4

Photos and Story
by Chris Lew

Fine Arts Building 1, top, and Fine Arts Building 4 sit vacant. Renovations, which included asbestos removal and seismic retrofits, were halted in February when the contractor was found in default.


ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement


©2000 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved. 

ADVERTISEMENT